![]() ![]() You can easily see and edit all your plug-ins at once instead of opening them in pop-up windows The fx chain/tray is much more useful than what mixcraft offers. It's a very intuitive platform that allows you to do a lot, and it was great to learn on, but there were very noticeable improvements for me upon switching. I'll give you a ex-mixcraft users perspective: I used it for close to 15 years from MC4 all the way up to 9 pro studio before moving to Ableton Standard this year I'm going to copy my response to a previous Mixcraft question here, perhaps it will help: I'd rather buy and learn a new DAW from day 1 if it's worth it. I just don't want to invest a ton of time into a DAW that, despite purchasing it, won't be sufficient to get the job done as well as its peers. So what's the deal with Mixcraft? Is it incredibly unpopular because it's just nowhere near as good, or capable, as other DAWs? Or is it just that it's the unfashionable kid on the block?Īny feedback appreciated. In my naivety, some months back, I purchased Mixcraft so now feel kinda committed, as I've checked the prices out for other DAWs and can see how expensive they are. I assumed this would be the case with most DAWs today, so I tried trial versions (and am still trying them) of Cubase, Reaper, Sonus (whatever its full name is), FL Studio, Ableton Live and Reason.įor some reason, I wasn't able to get to grips with ANY of them without reading/watching a tutorial first. Recently I gave Mixcraft a shot and whilst just doing other stuff, found it unbelievably easy to use in terms of arrangement, MIDI editing and just generally building the basics. ![]() I last messed around with Cubase 20 something years ago, but didn't have a good PC so with all the latency I kinda gave up. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |